Skip to main content
Home
Teacher
🔍
Back to Dashboard

Class Analytics

Period 3 ELA · Spring 2026

Live from Supabase

Class Average Over Time

Weekly class score trend (last 8 weeks)

Standards Mastery

Mastery % per CCSS standard

Score Distribution

Distribution of student scores

Standards Coverage

6 standards x 8 students mastery grid

EmmaLiamSophiaNoahAvaMasonMiaEthan
RI.6.1
92
78
85
70
65
88
91
74
RL.6.2
68
55
72
80
43
61
77
58
RL.6.3
85
90
62
48
73
67
82
56
W.6.1
77
83
91
66
59
74
88
70
L.6.1
94
87
76
82
90
68
71
95
SL.6.1
51
63
44
72
58
80
47
66
<4545-5960-7475-8990+
🧠

Embiggen Intelligence - This Week

Powered by adaptive analysis of 2,847 student data points

📈RL.9-10.6 mastery dropped 8 points class-wide. Students who struggled answered Q3 incorrectly. Consider reteaching point of view before Thursday's sprint.

Taylor Williams has a 0.72 GAR score, highest in the class. Her textual evidence strategy (annotation before answering) correlates with performance. Consider sharing her approach.

🚨3 students haven't logged in for 4+ days: Morgan Davis, Sam Kowalski, Avery Jackson. Fatigue indicators suggest disengagement, not ability.

📅Sprint completion peaks Tuesday and Wednesday (96%), drops Friday (73%). Friday sprints yield 18% lower scores. Consider moving high-stakes content mid-week.

Standards Mastery Heatmap

CCSS ELA 9-10 · Class averages

79%

RL.9-10.1

77%

RL.9-10.2

76%

RL.9-10.3

77%

RL.9-10.4

79%

RI.9-10.1

75%

RI.9-10.6

80%

W.9-10.1

77%

W.9-10.2

75%

W.9-10.5

84%

SL.9-10.1

76%

L.9-10.4

79%

L.9-10.5

Student Engagement

7-day active student rate

89%
Mon
94%
Tue
96%
Wed
88%
Thu
73%
Fri
31%
Sat
28%
Sun
School dayWeekend
⚠️

Students Needing Attention

Flagged by Embiggen engagement analysis

Morgan Davis

6d inactive41% mastery

Skipped last 3 sprints; survey response: "I don't see the point"

Suggested: Send encouragement message

Sam Kowalski

5d inactive53% mastery

Login duration dropped from 22 min to 4 min avg over 2 weeks

Suggested: Schedule check-in

Avery Jackson

4d inactive47% mastery

Completed sprints but accuracy fell from 78% to 39%

Suggested: Reduce sprint length

GAR Distribution

Growth Above Replacement · Your impact vs. benchmarks

Ms. Johnson (You)+0.34
District Average+0.18
State Average+0.12

GAR (Growth Above Replacement) measures how much your students grew compared to expected growth for their starting level. A GAR of +0.3 means students grew 30% more than expected. Positive = above expected, negative = below.

🔎

Misconception Report

Patterns where 3+ students share the same wrong answer, suggesting a common misconception to reteach

RL.9-10.17 students

Identifying implicit vs. explicit textual evidence

Common wrong answer pattern: Selected the most emotionally appealing detail instead of the most analytically strong evidence

Suggested action: Reteach the difference between emotional reaction and analytical evidence. Use a side-by-side exercise.

W.9-10.15 students

Constructing a counterclaim with evidence

Common wrong answer pattern: Dismissed the counterargument without engaging with its reasoning

Suggested action: Model the concede-and-redirect strategy. Show examples where acknowledging the other side strengthens the argument.

RI.9-10.24 students

Distinguishing central idea from supporting details

Common wrong answer pattern: Chose a specific detail or example instead of the overarching central idea

Suggested action: Practice the "umbrella test": does the main idea cover ALL the details, or is it just one of them?

RL.9-10.13 students

Evaluating reliability of narrator claims

Common wrong answer pattern: Took the narrator at face value instead of identifying contradictions between claims and actions

Suggested action: Introduce the concept of unreliable narration. Compare what a narrator says vs. what the text shows.

Analytics generated by Embiggen · Data refreshed every 15 minutes · Demo High